What’s the magic word? What we talk about when we talk about energy efficiency

Abstract

Energy efficiency has become an integrated and common concept both in modern language and public discourse, and central for policies directed to mitigate climate change as well as competitiveness. Yet definitions and effects of energy- efficiency and reduction is still an ongoing debate within academic discourse. This article investigate how industrial energy efficiency is framed and features in media narratives. Media discourses both reflect and shape public opinion and essentially the political sphere, calling for an improved understanding of how energy efficiency features in public discourse. The paper is based on a media analysis of 309 articles featuring “industrial energy efficiency” in a selection of Norwegian newspapers in the period between 2013-2017. We find numerous different framings of energy efficiency in the articles, where the authors draw on various notions of relative and absolute reduction in consumption, indicators and diffuse system and temporal boundaries. Even more common is the tendency to frame energy efficiency generically without explicit or implicit assumptions about reduction in consumption. The analysis show that energy efficiency is rarely an object of contention or controversy and often not even the topic of the articles itself. Rather it figures in arguments within narratives of climate change mitigation and economic stability and growth. The paper outlines the underlying structures of how energy efficiency serves as a legitimizing concept in these narratives, as well as ammunition on both sides of heated controversies regarding development of renewable wind or hydro-parks, transmission lines and oil & gas industry. The combination of a multitude of framings and generically use of the concept essentially allows a black-boxing of the relationship between energy efficiency and reduction. Consequently, the concept of energy efficiency features in the discourse as a magic word, where the prospects of fixing both the climate and the economy makes it suitable to legitimize almost every thinkable argument within narratives of transition.